Cancelling hearings
In this guide
A Chair of the Fitness to Practise Committee has the power to decide that a hearing should be cancelled and the matter closed.1 We use this power only in very limited circumstances.
When we take the decision to cancel hearings
Back to topWe will apply to cancel a hearing if we know that the nurse, midwife or nursing associate has a terminal illness. When this happens, we close the case because we recognise it wouldn’t be right for us to continue to pursue a case about a regulatory concern in those circumstances.
We don’t apply to cancel hearings just because there are difficulties with our evidence. Then, the right way forward is for us to apply the Fitness to Practise Committee to offer no evidence.
Nurses, midwives and nursing associates are also able to apply for agreed removal, which can bring their registration to an end without their case going to a final adjudication.
These powers are usually more appropriate than us using our power to cancel a hearing.
What happens when we apply to cancel a hearing?
Back to topOur case presenter will prepare a document, called a ‘reasoned opinion’ that sets the background to the case, and explains the nurse, midwife or nursing associate’s health condition.
The Chair will then decide whether to direct that the case should be closed.
Our rules require the Chair to give the person who made the allegation, a reasonable opportunity to comment on what we propose to do, and to take any comments into account.
Our case presenter will always consider what a reasonable opportunity is in every case that they prepare a reasoned opinion.
Our general position, though, is that because information about a nurse, midwife or nursing associate's terminal illness is sensitive and confidential, it is generally not necessary to our statutory role for us to share this information.
This means that a reasonable opportunity to comment will usually not involve us sharing information about the nurse, midwife or nursing associate’s health condition with the person who made the allegation.
After a hearing is cancelled
Back to topIf the Chair directs that the case should be closed, this will mean that the nurse, midwife or nursing associate’s registration will lapse if they haven’t paid their fee or completed revalidation, and they won’t still be subject to a fitness to practise allegation, which would otherwise have kept their registration active.2
A decision to close a case is not a ‘final determination’, because the panel has not made a fully reasoned decision about the substance of the case, the evidence, or the nurse, midwife or nursing associate’s fitness to practise.
This means that any interim order in place will have to be removed by a panel before the nurse, midwife or nursing associate’s registration can lapse. We will usually have arranged this before we consider an application to cancel a hearing. We always review the evidence relevant to interim orders, and if we become aware that a nurse, midwife or nursing associate has a terminal illness, it is extremely unlikely that an interim order to protect the public from any difficulties in their practice will still be needed.
1 Rule 33 of the Nursing and Midwifery Council (Fitness to Practise) Rules 2004
- Download
- Email Page
- Last Updated: 04/01/2019
Want to download and print whole sections of this FtP library? Visit the downloads page.
Related guides
FtP library
-
Understanding Fitness to Practise
- Aims and principles for fitness to practise
- Allegations we consider
- How we determine seriousness
- Why we screen cases
- When we use interim orders
- Investigations
- Examining cases
- How we manage cases
- Meetings and hearings
- Resolving cases by agreement
- What sanctions are and when we might use them
-
Taking account of context
- Taking account of context - overview
- 1: We’ll approach cases on the basis that most people referred to us are normally safe
- 2: We’ll seek to build an accurate picture about the nurse, midwife or nursing associate’s practising history
- 3: We’ll always carefully consider evidence of discrimination, victimisation, bullying or harassment
- 4: Where risks are caused by system and process failures, we’ll concentrate on the action we can take to help resolve the underlying issues
- 5: In cases where a nurse, midwife or nursing associate was required to use their professional judgement we’ll respond proportionately
- 6: Evidence of steps the nurse, midwife or nursing associate has taken to address serious concerns caused by a gap in knowledge or training or personal context factors
- 7: We’ll always look into whether group norms or culture influenced an individual’s behaviour before taking action
- 8: Where an incident has occurred because of cultural problems, we’ll concentrate on taking action to minimise the risk of the same thing happening again
- What context factors we think are important to know about when considering a case
- Our culture of curiosity
- Decisions of the Disclosure and Barring Service (DBS) and Disclosure Scotland
- Insight and strengthened practice
- Engaging with your case
-
Screening
-
Our overall approach
- Our overall approach - overview
-
The Three Questions we ask when making Screening Decisions
- The Three Questions we ask when making Screening Decisions - overview
- Do we have a written concern about a nurse, midwife or nursing associate on our register?
- Is there evidence of a serious concern that could require us to take regulatory action to protect the public
- Is there clear evidence to show that the nurse, midwife or nursing associate is currently fit to practise?
- Clinical advice
- Referrals to other regulators
- Referrers that wish to remain anonymous
- Whistleblowing
- A decision not to take any further action at this time
- Determining the regulatory concern
- Cases that may involve incorrect or fraudulent entry
-
Our overall approach
- Interim Orders
- Investigations
- Case Examiners
-
Preparing for the FtP Committee
- Reviewing cases after they are referred to the FtPC
-
Drafting charges
- Why do we have guidance on charges?
- Jargon buster
- General approach
- How a charge becomes final
- Practical drafting issues
- Particular features of misconduct charging
- Drafting charges in health cases
- Other fitness to practise charges
- Multiple allegations
- Drafting charges in incorrect or fraudulent entry cases
- Documents panels use when deciding cases
- Gathering further evidence after the investigation
- Disclosure
- Notice of our hearings and meetings
-
Case management
- Hearing fitness to practise allegations together
- Telephone conferences
- Preliminary meetings
- Considering cases at meetings and hearings
- Removal by Agreement
- Cancelling hearings
- Constitution of panels
- Proceeding with hearings when the nurse, midwife or nursing associate is absent
- Case management during hearings
- Hearings in private and in public
- When we postpone or adjourn hearings
- Supporting people to give evidence in hearings
-
FtP Committee decision making
- Impairment
- Consensual panel determination
- Offering no evidence
- Abuse of process
- Directing further investigation during a hearing
- Evidence
- Making decisions on sexual misconduct
- Making decisions on dishonesty charges and the professional duty of candour
- Agreed removal at hearings
- Deciding on incorrect or fraudulent entry
- Sanctions
-
Reviews
- Reviewing case examiner decisions
- Interim order reviews
-
Substantive order reviews
- Substantive order reviews - overview
- Standard reviews of substantive orders before they expire
- Early review
- Exceptional cases: changing orders with immediate effect at a standard review
- Review of striking-off orders
- New allegations
- Reviewing orders when there may have been a breach
- Reviews where an interim order is in place
- Removal from the register when there is a substantive order in place
- Appeals and restoration