Jargon buster
In this guide
Allegations
Back to topOne of our key statutory functions is to investigate allegations about the fitness to practise of nurses, midwives and nursing associates, or their entry in the register. Fitness to practise allegations involve us alleging that the nurse, midwife or nursing associate’s fitness to practise is ‘impaired’.
For this reason, when we first assess, investigate, and when our case examiners consider ‘allegations’, we define ‘allegation’ as meaning simply an allegation to the effect that the nurse, midwife or nursing associate’s fitness to practise is impaired.
Regulatory concerns
Back to topDuring the early stages of a case we draft regulatory concerns to summarise what appears to have happened in a particular case, that is sufficiently serious to raise a question about:
- whether it’s currently safe for the nurse, midwife or nursing associate to be able to practise without restriction or
- whether the public’s trust and confidence in nurses, midwives and nursing associates could be affected.
Charges
Back to topA charge only comes into existence when we send the nurse, midwife or nursing associate notice of their final hearing or meeting before the Fitness to Practise Committee.
Before then, if we any refer to a charge, we mean a ‘draft charge’.
The notice of a substantive hearing will contain a charge ‘particularising’ (or setting out) the alleged facts on which the allegation of impaired fitness to practise is based.
The charge is the public statement of the basis on which we are saying the nurse, midwife or nursing associate’s fitness to practise is impaired.
It will allege that the nurse, midwife or nursing associate’s fitness to practise is impaired because of one or more of the following (as set out in our legislation):
- misconduct
- lack of competence
- a conviction or caution
- health
- not having the necessary knowledge of English
- a determination by another health or social care organisation.
So, the meaning of ‘charge’ within our rules is:
- an assertion that a nurse, midwife or nursing associate’s fitness to practise is impaired, making particular reference to one of the kinds of impairment from our Order (for example, ‘your fitness to practise is impaired by reason of your lack of competence’); and
- the schedule of alleged facts which we send together with a notice of hearing, which ‘particularises’ the allegation of impaired fitness to practise.
Additionally, in everyday language, people taking part in Fitness to Practise Committee hearings will often refer to one or more of the individual ‘alleged facts’ within a schedule of charge as ‘charge 1’, ‘charge 6(a)(ii)’, and so on.
- Download
- Email Page
- Last Updated: 29/11/2021
Want to download and print whole sections of this FtP library? Visit the downloads page.
FtP library
-
Understanding Fitness to Practise
- Aims and principles for fitness to practise
- Allegations we consider
- How we determine seriousness
- Why we screen cases
- When we use interim orders
- Investigations
- Examining cases
- How we manage cases
- Meetings and hearings
- Resolving cases by agreement
- What sanctions are and when we might use them
-
Taking account of context
- Taking account of context - overview
- 1: We’ll approach cases on the basis that most people referred to us are normally safe
- 2: We’ll seek to build an accurate picture about the nurse, midwife or nursing associate’s practising history
- 3: We’ll always carefully consider evidence of discrimination, victimisation, bullying or harassment
- 4: Where risks are caused by system and process failures, we’ll concentrate on the action we can take to help resolve the underlying issues
- 5: In cases where a nurse, midwife or nursing associate was required to use their professional judgement we’ll respond proportionately
- 6: Evidence of steps the nurse, midwife or nursing associate has taken to address serious concerns caused by a gap in knowledge or training or personal context factors
- 7: We’ll always look into whether group norms or culture influenced an individual’s behaviour before taking action
- 8: Where an incident has occurred because of cultural problems, we’ll concentrate on taking action to minimise the risk of the same thing happening again
- What context factors we think are important to know about when considering a case
- Our culture of curiosity
- Decisions of the Disclosure and Barring Service (DBS) and Disclosure Scotland
- Insight and strengthened practice
- Engaging with your case
-
Screening
-
Our overall approach
- Our overall approach - overview
-
The Three Questions we ask when making Screening Decisions
- The Three Questions we ask when making Screening Decisions - overview
- Do we have a written concern about a nurse, midwife or nursing associate on our register?
- Is there evidence of a serious concern that could require us to take regulatory action to protect the public
- Is there clear evidence to show that the nurse, midwife or nursing associate is currently fit to practise?
- Clinical advice
- Referrals to other regulators
- Referrers that wish to remain anonymous
- Whistleblowing
- A decision not to take any further action at this time
- Determining the regulatory concern
- Cases that may involve incorrect or fraudulent entry
-
Our overall approach
- Interim Orders
- Investigations
- Case Examiners
-
Preparing for the FtP Committee
- Reviewing cases after they are referred to the FtPC
-
Drafting charges
- Why do we have guidance on charges?
- Jargon buster
- General approach
- How a charge becomes final
- Practical drafting issues
- Particular features of misconduct charging
- Drafting charges in health cases
- Other fitness to practise charges
- Multiple allegations
- Drafting charges in incorrect or fraudulent entry cases
- Documents panels use when deciding cases
- Gathering further evidence after the investigation
- Disclosure
- Notice of our hearings and meetings
-
Case management
- Hearing fitness to practise allegations together
- Telephone conferences
- Preliminary meetings
- Considering cases at meetings and hearings
- Removal by Agreement
- Cancelling hearings
- Constitution of panels
- Proceeding with hearings when the nurse, midwife or nursing associate is absent
- Case management during hearings
- Hearings in private and in public
- When we postpone or adjourn hearings
- Supporting people to give evidence in hearings
-
FtP Committee decision making
- Impairment
- Consensual panel determination
- Offering no evidence
- Abuse of process
- Directing further investigation during a hearing
- Evidence
- Making decisions on sexual misconduct
- Making decisions on dishonesty charges and the professional duty of candour
- Agreed removal at hearings
- Deciding on incorrect or fraudulent entry
- Sanctions
-
Reviews
- Reviewing case examiner decisions
- Interim order reviews
-
Substantive order reviews
- Substantive order reviews - overview
- Standard reviews of substantive orders before they expire
- Early review
- Exceptional cases: changing orders with immediate effect at a standard review
- Review of striking-off orders
- New allegations
- Reviewing orders when there may have been a breach
- Reviews where an interim order is in place
- Removal from the register when there is a substantive order in place
- Appeals and restoration