Taking no further action
In this guide
When the panel makes the first sanction decision in a case
Back to topThe Fitness to Practise Committee does have a discretion to take no further action and impose no sanction immediately after it has first decided that a nurse, midwife or nursing associate’s fitness to practise is impaired. However, the panel will use this discretion only in rare cases, and it will need to explain its decision very clearly.
This is because as part of its decision about fitness to practise, the panel must already have decided that the nurse, midwife or nursing asociate:
- presents a continuing risk to patients
- was responsible for conduct or failings that undermined the public’s trust in nurses, midwives or nursing associates, or
- breached one of the fundamental tenets of the professions.
Any one of those factors, or more than one, may apply in a particular case. They will usually mean that to achieve our overarching objective of public protection, the panel needs to take action to secure patient safety, to secure public trust in nurses, midwives and nursing associates, or to promote and maintain proper professional standards and conduct.
So before taking no further action, the panel will need to explain in detail why it is appropriate to do so, even though it has decided that the nurse, midwife or nursing associate’s fitness to practise is currently impaired. It will need to carefully identify the circumstances, along with clear and reliable evidence that supports its approach.
On review of an existing sanction order
Back to topWhen the Fitness to Practise Committee is reviewing an existing sanction order against a nurse, midwife or nursing associate, the panel first has to decide whether the nurse, midwife or nursing associate’s fitness to practise is still impaired.
If the panel decides that the nurse, midwife or nursing associate’s fitness to practise is still impaired, in some circumstances, taking no action and allowing the order to expire can be the best way to protect the public from the concerns about a nurse, midwife or nursing associate’s practice.
We explain these circumstances, and how to decide when this will be the best way to make sure the public remains protected, in our guidance on allowing orders to expire when a nurse, midwife or nursing associate’s registration will lapse.
- Download
- Email Page
- Last Updated: 12/10/2018
Want to download and print whole sections of this FtP library? Visit the downloads page.
FtP library
-
Understanding Fitness to Practise
- Aims and principles for fitness to practise
- Allegations we consider
- How we determine seriousness
- Why we screen cases
- When we use interim orders
- Investigations
- Examining cases
- How we manage cases
- Meetings and hearings
- Resolving cases by agreement
- What sanctions are and when we might use them
-
Taking account of context
- Taking account of context - overview
- 1: We’ll approach cases on the basis that most people referred to us are normally safe
- 2: We’ll seek to build an accurate picture about the nurse, midwife or nursing associate’s practising history
- 3: We’ll always carefully consider evidence of discrimination, victimisation, bullying or harassment
- 4: Where risks are caused by system and process failures, we’ll concentrate on the action we can take to help resolve the underlying issues
- 5: In cases where a nurse, midwife or nursing associate was required to use their professional judgement we’ll respond proportionately
- 6: Evidence of steps the nurse, midwife or nursing associate has taken to address serious concerns caused by a gap in knowledge or training or personal context factors
- 7: We’ll always look into whether group norms or culture influenced an individual’s behaviour before taking action
- 8: Where an incident has occurred because of cultural problems, we’ll concentrate on taking action to minimise the risk of the same thing happening again
- What context factors we think are important to know about when considering a case
- Our culture of curiosity
- Decisions of the Disclosure and Barring Service (DBS) and Disclosure Scotland
- Insight and strengthened practice
- Engaging with your case
-
Screening
-
Our overall approach
- Our overall approach - overview
-
The Three Questions we ask when making Screening Decisions
- The Three Questions we ask when making Screening Decisions - overview
- Do we have a written concern about a nurse, midwife or nursing associate on our register?
- Is there evidence of a serious concern that could require us to take regulatory action to protect the public
- Is there clear evidence to show that the nurse, midwife or nursing associate is currently fit to practise?
- Clinical advice
- Referrals to other regulators
- Referrers that wish to remain anonymous
- Whistleblowing
- A decision not to take any further action at this time
- Determining the regulatory concern
- Cases that may involve incorrect or fraudulent entry
-
Our overall approach
- Interim Orders
- Investigations
- Case Examiners
-
Preparing for the FtP Committee
- Reviewing cases after they are referred to the FtPC
-
Drafting charges
- Why do we have guidance on charges?
- Jargon buster
- General approach
- How a charge becomes final
- Practical drafting issues
- Particular features of misconduct charging
- Drafting charges in health cases
- Other fitness to practise charges
- Multiple allegations
- Drafting charges in incorrect or fraudulent entry cases
- Documents panels use when deciding cases
- Gathering further evidence after the investigation
- Disclosure
- Notice of our hearings and meetings
-
Case management
- Hearing fitness to practise allegations together
- Telephone conferences
- Preliminary meetings
- Considering cases at meetings and hearings
- Removal by Agreement
- Cancelling hearings
- Constitution of panels
- Proceeding with hearings when the nurse, midwife or nursing associate is absent
- Case management during hearings
- Hearings in private and in public
- When we postpone or adjourn hearings
- Supporting people to give evidence in hearings
-
FtP Committee decision making
- Impairment
- Consensual panel determination
- Offering no evidence
- Abuse of process
- Directing further investigation during a hearing
- Evidence
- Making decisions on sexual misconduct
- Making decisions on dishonesty charges and the professional duty of candour
- Agreed removal at hearings
- Deciding on incorrect or fraudulent entry
- Sanctions
-
Reviews
- Reviewing case examiner decisions
- Interim order reviews
-
Substantive order reviews
- Substantive order reviews - overview
- Standard reviews of substantive orders before they expire
- Early review
- Exceptional cases: changing orders with immediate effect at a standard review
- Review of striking-off orders
- New allegations
- Reviewing orders when there may have been a breach
- Reviews where an interim order is in place
- Removal from the register when there is a substantive order in place
- Appeals and restoration