Striking-off order
A striking-off order is the most serious sanction. It results in removing the nurse, midwife or nursing associate’s name from the register, which prevents them from working as a registered nurse, midwife or nursing associate.
This sanction is likely to be appropriate when what the nurse, midwife or nursing associate has done is fundamentally incompatible with being a registered professional. Before imposing this sanction, key considerations the panel will take into account include:
- Do the regulatory concerns about the nurse, midwife or nursing associate raise fundamental questions about their professionalism?
- Can public confidence in nurses, midwives and nursing associates be maintained if the nurse, midwife or nursing associate is not struck off from the register?
- Is striking-off the only sanction which will be sufficient to protect patients, members of the public, or maintain professional standards?
The panel should refer to our guidance on seriousness, which highlights a number of factors indicating which kinds of concern it may not be possible for the nurse, midwife or nursing associate to address or put right, and which will most seriously affect the public's trust and confidence in registered nurses, midwives or nursing associates.
The courts have supported decisions to strike off healthcare professionals where there has been lack of probity, honesty or trustworthiness, notwithstanding that in other regards there were no concerns around the professional’s clinical skills or any risk of harm to the public.1 Striking-off orders have been upheld on the basis that they have been justified for reasons of maintaining trust and confidence in the professions.
When a striking off order cannot be used
A striking-off order can’t be used if the nurse, midwife or nursing associate’s fitness to practise is impaired due to:
- their health,
- lack of competence or
- not having the necessary knowledge of English
until they have been on either a suspension order or a conditions of practice order for a continuous period of two years.
The two-year period can be made up of a combination of periods of suspension and conditions, provided that there is a continuous period during which the nurse, midwife or nursing associate’s practice has been subject to restriction under a substantive order.
The panel should also refer to the guidance on standard reviews of substantive orders if they are considering imposing a strike off at a substantive order review hearing.
Restoration
A nurse, midwife or nursing associate who has been subject to a striking off order may not apply for restoration until a period of five years has elapsed since the striking-off order was made. Our guidance on restoration explains how the Fitness to Practise Committee approaches these applications.
1 For example, Parkinson v NMC [2010] EWHC 1898 (Admin), Mvenge v GMC [2010] EWHC 3529 (Admin), Ige v Nursing and Midwifery Council [2011] EWHC 3721 (Admin)
- Download
- Email Page
- Last Updated: 30/08/2024
Want to download and print whole sections of this FtP library? Visit the downloads page.
FtP library
-
Understanding Fitness to Practise
- Aims and principles for fitness to practise
- Allegations we consider
- How we determine seriousness
- Why we screen cases
- When we use interim orders
- Investigations
- Examining cases
- How we manage cases
- Meetings and hearings
- Resolving cases by agreement
- What sanctions are and when we might use them
-
Taking account of context
- Taking account of context - overview
- 1: We’ll approach cases on the basis that most people referred to us are normally safe
- 2: We’ll seek to build an accurate picture about the nurse, midwife or nursing associate’s practising history
- 3: We’ll always carefully consider evidence of discrimination, victimisation, bullying or harassment
- 4: Where risks are caused by system and process failures, we’ll concentrate on the action we can take to help resolve the underlying issues
- 5: In cases where a nurse, midwife or nursing associate was required to use their professional judgement we’ll respond proportionately
- 6: Evidence of steps the nurse, midwife or nursing associate has taken to address serious concerns caused by a gap in knowledge or training or personal context factors
- 7: We’ll always look into whether group norms or culture influenced an individual’s behaviour before taking action
- 8: Where an incident has occurred because of cultural problems, we’ll concentrate on taking action to minimise the risk of the same thing happening again
- What context factors we think are important to know about when considering a case
- Our culture of curiosity
- Decisions of the Disclosure and Barring Service (DBS) and Disclosure Scotland
- Insight and strengthened practice
- Engaging with your case
-
Screening
-
Our overall approach
- Our overall approach - overview
-
The Three Questions we ask when making Screening Decisions
- The Three Questions we ask when making Screening Decisions - overview
- Do we have a written concern about a nurse, midwife or nursing associate on our register?
- Is there evidence of a serious concern that could require us to take regulatory action to protect the public
- Is there clear evidence to show that the nurse, midwife or nursing associate is currently fit to practise?
- Clinical advice
- Referrals to other regulators
- Referrers that wish to remain anonymous
- Whistleblowing
- A decision not to take any further action at this time
- Determining the regulatory concern
- Cases that may involve incorrect or fraudulent entry
-
Our overall approach
- Interim Orders
- Investigations
- Case Examiners
-
Preparing for the FtP Committee
- Reviewing cases after they are referred to the FtPC
-
Drafting charges
- Why do we have guidance on charges?
- Jargon buster
- General approach
- How a charge becomes final
- Practical drafting issues
- Particular features of misconduct charging
- Drafting charges in health cases
- Other fitness to practise charges
- Multiple allegations
- Drafting charges in incorrect or fraudulent entry cases
- Documents panels use when deciding cases
- Gathering further evidence after the investigation
- Disclosure
- Notice of our hearings and meetings
-
Case management
- Hearing fitness to practise allegations together
- Telephone conferences
- Preliminary meetings
- Considering cases at meetings and hearings
- Removal by Agreement
- Cancelling hearings
- Constitution of panels
- Proceeding with hearings when the nurse, midwife or nursing associate is absent
- Case management during hearings
- Hearings in private and in public
- When we postpone or adjourn hearings
- Supporting people to give evidence in hearings
-
FtP Committee decision making
- Impairment
- Consensual panel determination
- Offering no evidence
- Abuse of process
- Directing further investigation during a hearing
- Evidence
- Making decisions on sexual misconduct
- Making decisions on dishonesty charges and the professional duty of candour
- Agreed removal at hearings
- Deciding on incorrect or fraudulent entry
- Sanctions
-
Reviews
- Reviewing case examiner decisions
- Interim order reviews
-
Substantive order reviews
- Substantive order reviews - overview
- Standard reviews of substantive orders before they expire
- Early review
- Exceptional cases: changing orders with immediate effect at a standard review
- Review of striking-off orders
- New allegations
- Reviewing orders when there may have been a breach
- Reviews where an interim order is in place
- Removal from the register when there is a substantive order in place
- Appeals and restoration