Directly referring specified offences to the Fitness to Practise Committee
We may pass the case directly to the Fitness to Practise Committee for their decision if:
- a nurse, midwife or nursing associate has been sentenced to imprisonment (including a suspended prison sentence), and/or
- the conviction was for a specified offence.
Specified offences are offences which are, by definition, particularly serious. The nature of these convictions would raise fundamental questions about a nurse, midwife or nursing associate’s ability to uphold the standards and values set out in the Code.
We will always take into account how long ago the offending happened when we decide whether to send it directly to the Committee.
What are specified offences?
In our guidance ‘specified offences’ means:
- hate crimes
- sexual offences
- serious offences involving children
- other serious offences listed below
Hate crimes
We consider that a hate crime is any criminal offence in which a professional has:
- demonstrated hostility based on race, religion, disability, sexual orientation or transgender identity or
- been motivated by hostility based on race, religion, disability, sexual orientation or transgender identity.1
Sexual offences
Sexual offences are offences which involve sexual activity or sexual motivation. They include crimes such as rape or sexual assault, any sexually motivated crimes against children including child sexual abuse or grooming, the taking or sharing of indecent images of children, and crimes that exploit others for a sexual purpose, whether in person or online.
Serious offences involving children
In addition to sexual offences involving children, this includes:
- Cruelty to a child – assault and ill treatment, abandonment, neglect, and failure to protect
- Causing or allowing a child to suffer serious physical harm or causing or allowing a child to die
- Offences under the Female Genital Mutilation Act 2003 including: female genital mutilation; assisting a girl to mutilate her own genitalia and assisting a non-UK person to mutilate overseas a girl’s genitalia
Other serious offences
- murder
- manslaughter
- offences that relate to the death or serious injury of any person, or a substantial financial gain or serious financial loss to any person
- offences that relate to:
- serious harm to the security of the state or to public order
- serious interference with the administration of justice or with the investigation of offences
-
human trafficking
-
slavery, servitude and forced or compulsory labour
-
extortion
-
blackmail
-
kidnapping
-
causing an explosion likely to endanger life or property
-
serious offences under the Firearms Act 1968
-
hostage taking
-
torture
-
serious drug-related offences
-
hijacking offences
-
causing death by dangerous driving, causing death by driving when disqualified from driving, and causing death by careless driving when under the influence of drink or drugs.
1 This definition was used by the CPS and the former Association of Chief Police Officers.
- Download
- Email Page
- Last Updated: 27/02/2024
Want to download and print whole sections of this FtP library? Visit the downloads page.
Related guides
FtP library
-
Understanding Fitness to Practise
- Aims and principles for fitness to practise
- Allegations we consider
- How we determine seriousness
- Why we screen cases
- When we use interim orders
- Investigations
- Examining cases
- How we manage cases
- Meetings and hearings
- Resolving cases by agreement
- What sanctions are and when we might use them
-
Taking account of context
- Taking account of context - overview
- 1: We’ll approach cases on the basis that most people referred to us are normally safe
- 2: We’ll seek to build an accurate picture about the nurse, midwife or nursing associate’s practising history
- 3: We’ll always carefully consider evidence of discrimination, victimisation, bullying or harassment
- 4: Where risks are caused by system and process failures, we’ll concentrate on the action we can take to help resolve the underlying issues
- 5: In cases where a nurse, midwife or nursing associate was required to use their professional judgement we’ll respond proportionately
- 6: Evidence of steps the nurse, midwife or nursing associate has taken to address serious concerns caused by a gap in knowledge or training or personal context factors
- 7: We’ll always look into whether group norms or culture influenced an individual’s behaviour before taking action
- 8: Where an incident has occurred because of cultural problems, we’ll concentrate on taking action to minimise the risk of the same thing happening again
- What context factors we think are important to know about when considering a case
- Our culture of curiosity
- Decisions of the Disclosure and Barring Service (DBS) and Disclosure Scotland
- Insight and strengthened practice
- Engaging with your case
-
Screening
-
Our overall approach
- Our overall approach - overview
-
The Three Questions we ask when making Screening Decisions
- The Three Questions we ask when making Screening Decisions - overview
- Do we have a written concern about a nurse, midwife or nursing associate on our register?
- Is there evidence of a serious concern that could require us to take regulatory action to protect the public
- Is there clear evidence to show that the nurse, midwife or nursing associate is currently fit to practise?
- Clinical advice
- Referrals to other regulators
- Referrers that wish to remain anonymous
- Whistleblowing
- A decision not to take any further action at this time
- Determining the regulatory concern
- Cases that may involve incorrect or fraudulent entry
-
Our overall approach
- Interim Orders
- Investigations
- Case Examiners
-
Preparing for the FtP Committee
- Reviewing cases after they are referred to the FtPC
-
Drafting charges
- Why do we have guidance on charges?
- Jargon buster
- General approach
- How a charge becomes final
- Practical drafting issues
- Particular features of misconduct charging
- Drafting charges in health cases
- Other fitness to practise charges
- Multiple allegations
- Drafting charges in incorrect or fraudulent entry cases
- Documents panels use when deciding cases
- Gathering further evidence after the investigation
- Disclosure
- Notice of our hearings and meetings
-
Case management
- Hearing fitness to practise allegations together
- Telephone conferences
- Preliminary meetings
- Considering cases at meetings and hearings
- Removal by Agreement
- Cancelling hearings
- Constitution of panels
- Proceeding with hearings when the nurse, midwife or nursing associate is absent
- Case management during hearings
- Hearings in private and in public
- When we postpone or adjourn hearings
- Supporting people to give evidence in hearings
-
FtP Committee decision making
- Impairment
- Consensual panel determination
- Offering no evidence
- Abuse of process
- Directing further investigation during a hearing
- Evidence
- Making decisions on sexual misconduct
- Making decisions on dishonesty charges and the professional duty of candour
- Agreed removal at hearings
- Deciding on incorrect or fraudulent entry
- Sanctions
-
Reviews
- Reviewing case examiner decisions
- Interim order reviews
-
Substantive order reviews
- Substantive order reviews - overview
- Standard reviews of substantive orders before they expire
- Early review
- Exceptional cases: changing orders with immediate effect at a standard review
- Review of striking-off orders
- New allegations
- Reviewing orders when there may have been a breach
- Reviews where an interim order is in place
- Removal from the register when there is a substantive order in place
- Appeals and restoration